210% Over Target: Inside the Saudi Ministry That Turned Culture Into a KPI

How Saudi Arabia Is Building a National Identity from the Inside Out

Research Article

Abstract

In 2025, Saudi Arabia's Ministry of Culture set a target of 3,010 cultural event days. The actual result was 6,314 days. The achievement rate was 210 percent. The source is the Ministry of Culture Annual Report 2025, a publicly released document that tracks every dimension of Saudi cultural output against stated KPIs. This is not an entertainment statistic. It is a data point in one of the most deliberate and ambitious exercises in national identity construction in the contemporary world. This article examines what it means when a state decides to make culture a strategic asset. It draws on the 2025 report to trace the architecture of this project: its commissions, its KPIs, its international ambitions, and its underlying logic. It also asks the harder question: what can culture tell us that KPIs cannot? And what can any leader, ministry, or organization learn from the way Saudi Arabia has designed this system?

1. Introduction

Every nation has a culture. Not every nation has a cultural strategy.

The difference matters. Culture that emerges organically from the lives and creative acts of a population is one thing. Culture that is identified, funded, measured, and deployed as a component of national transformation is something else. It is not less real. But it operates according to a different logic. It has targets. It has KPIs. It has a minister.

Saudi Arabia has made this move formally, comprehensively, and at speed. The Ministry of Culture, established in 2020, operates with sixteen defined cultural sectors, eleven dedicated cultural commissions, and a strategic framework aligned with Vision 2030's three pillars. Its 2025 annual report is a document of remarkable ambition and specificity. It is not a description of cultural life. It is a management report on the production of a national identity.

This article examines what that means. The question Prince Researcher asks of every system is the same: how does it work, what does it produce, and what does it reveal about the relationship between trust, legitimacy, and narrative? The Saudi cultural project is one of the most instructive answers to those questions available in the world today.

2. The Architecture of the Project

2.1 Where the 210% Comes From

The headline figure requires explanation. The Ministry of Culture tracks a KPI called "number of cultural event days." This measures the total number of days on which temporary cultural activities led by the Ministry and its ecosystem take place across the Kingdom. The target set for 2025 was 3,010 days. The actual result, as reported in the Ministry of Culture Annual Report 2025, was 6,314 days. The achievement rate: 210 percent.

This figure is not isolated. Across the report, overachievement is the pattern, not the exception.

Visitors to national and UNESCO heritage sites: 14.1 million against a target of 7.19 million. Achievement rate: 196 percent. International cultural participations: 71 against a target of 34. Achievement rate: 209 percent. Non-profit cultural programs: 359 against a target of 75. Achievement rate: 479 percent. Cultural volunteers: 5,536 against a target of 1,588. Achievement rate: 349 percent. Volunteer hours: 409,323 against a target of 82,579. Achievement rate: 496 percent.

All figures are drawn directly from the Ministry of Culture Annual Report 2025. The report is a public document. Its methodology is explained. Its targets were set in advance. Its results are auditable.

The pattern of consistent overachievement across unrelated KPIs suggests something important. Ambitious targets are being set. Reality is exceeding them. This is the signature of a system that is both well-designed and operating in conditions of genuine public enthusiasm.

2.2 Sixteen Sectors, Eleven Commissions, One Strategy

The Ministry of Culture's strategic framework identifies sixteen cultural sectors. They include heritage, museums, cultural and archaeological sites, theater and performing arts, festivals and cultural events, books and publishing, architecture and design, natural heritage, film, fashion, language and translation, culinary arts, literature, libraries, visual arts, and music.

This is not a list of things the government likes. It is a taxonomy of national identity components. Each sector has been designated as a strategic asset. Each is assigned to a dedicated commission with its own budget, KPIs, and leadership. Each reports upward into a unified national cultural strategy.

The strategic pillars are three. Culture as a way of life. Culture for economic growth. Culture for international positioning. Together, they describe a project in which cultural production is simultaneously a social policy, an economic instrument, and a foreign policy tool. These three functions are not in tension. They are by design complementary.

The Ministry's vision, stated in the report, is "a rooted identity and bright horizons." This phrase is the strategy in seven words. The rooted identity looks backward. The bright horizons look forward. The entire institutional architecture sits between those two directions, managing the transition from one to the other without losing either.

2.3 The KPI System: Culture Made Measurable

The most distinctive feature of this project is its insistence on measurement. The report contains detailed KPI tables for every strategic objective. Targets are set. Results are tracked. Achievement rates are calculated. The numbers are published.

This is unusual. Cultural institutions in most countries resist measurement. Art is difficult to quantify. The impact of a museum visit or a heritage restoration project does not reduce easily to a number. Most cultural ministries report in broad qualitative terms, if they report at all.

The Saudi Ministry of Culture does not make this concession. Every cultural sector is measured. Every achievement is reported against a baseline. Cultural event days: 6,314 against a target of 3,010. Cultural sector employees: 282,709 against a target of 247,000. Cultural institutions: 94 against a target of 87. Cultural graduates: 29,221 against a target of 29,078.

These numbers do not describe culture happening. They describe culture being produced on a schedule, to specification, at scale.

The KPI system does something specific to cultural investment. It makes accountability possible. It makes comparison possible. It makes the argument that culture is working demonstrable in terms that finance ministries and investment communities understand. Culture becomes governable. And governable culture, by definition, is culture that can be directed.

3. What the State Is Building

3.1 Identity as Infrastructure

The Ministry's report uses specific vocabulary. It speaks of "consolidating national identity." It speaks of "spreading culture to all regions and segments of society." It speaks of culture as a "way of life" to be achieved, not merely described.

This vocabulary reveals the fundamental premise of the project. Identity is not being assumed. It is not being recovered. It is being constructed. The design respects and draws upon what exists. But it is design nonetheless.

Every nation-state engages in some form of identity construction. The question is the degree of intentionality and the scale of institutional investment. In Saudi Arabia's case, both are extraordinary.

Identity is being nurtured. Heritage is being preserved. Traditions are being curated. These are active verbs. They describe an institution that is not observing culture but managing it.

3.2 The Sixteen Sectors as Identity Components

Each of the sixteen cultural sectors is a dimension of the identity being constructed.

Heritage and museums anchor the project in historical depth. They provide the evidence that what is being built has roots. The 14.1 million visitors to heritage sites in 2025 are not merely tourists. They are Saudis and visitors encountering a curated version of the Kingdom's past. Each visit is an act of identity reinforcement.

The fashion commission develops an aesthetic language. Fashion is not decoration. It is the most personal and public expression of cultural belonging. The creation of a Saudi fashion industry, with intellectual property protections and training programs, is the creation of a visual vocabulary for national identity.

The culinary arts commission does something similar through food. The report documents a Michelin Guide for Saudi Arabia and the formalization of sixty food elements under the "Saudi Taste Journey" initiative. Food is being given a national character. It is being made legible as Saudi.

The music commission is preserving and creating simultaneously. The Saudi Music Memory project has produced notation books for Ramadan chants, Hajj chants, and Eid songs. Informal cultural memory is becoming documented cultural heritage. Documented heritage is reproducible. It can be taught in schools. It can be exported. It can be cited.

Each sector, taken individually, looks like reasonable cultural policy. Taken together, they form a complete identity system. Every dimension of daily life in which culture is expressed is being addressed by a dedicated institution with a specific mandate.

3.3 The International Dimension: Identity as Export

The Saudi cultural project is not exclusively domestic. The report records 113 international cultural participations in 2025. Saudi Arabia participated in Expo Osaka, drawing more than 3 million visitors to its national pavilion. It participated in the Venice Architecture Biennale. It hosted the 2025 Islamic Arts Biennale in Jeddah, attracting 650,000 visitors. It received the Prix Versailles award for one of the world's most beautiful museums for the Diriyah Art Futures project.

These international engagements are not cultural tourism. They are identity projection. Each is a deliberate act of presenting Saudi culture to a global audience on Saudi terms.

4. The Human Story Behind the Numbers

Numbers describe a system. People reveal whether it is working.

Roasting House was founded in Riyadh in 2013, when specialty coffee barely existed as a category in the Kingdom. Its co-founder Osama Alawwam describes a trajectory that mirrors the Ministry's cultural ambition. "Historically, cafes were hubs for poets, politicians, and thinkers," he has said. "Today, they are community spaces." By 2024, Roasting House had redefined itself, in his words, as "a customer experience company fueled by coffee." It represents the kind of cultural entrepreneurship the Ministry's framework is designed to support and accelerate.

The same dynamic is visible across sectors. Saudi women now represent nearly half of all employees in the tourism and hospitality sector, a transformation from a situation just years ago where female participation in these roles was structurally limited. The cultural sector's expansion created the spaces. Women filled them. A KPI captures the employment number. What it cannot capture is what it means to a woman in Riyadh or Jeddah to hold a professional identity in an industry that did not exist for her mother.

In the fashion sector, the Intellectual Property Guide launched by the Fashion Commission in 2025 enrolled more than a hundred Saudi designers and national institutions in its first phase. For a young designer trying to build a brand, the guide is not bureaucracy. It is infrastructure. It is the difference between a creative idea that remains personal and one that can become a business.

These stories are not isolated. They are the human texture of a system that is, at the aggregate level, producing the numbers the report publishes. The 282,709 employees in the cultural sector are not entries in a spreadsheet. They are people whose professional lives exist because an institution decided their work was worth building systems around.

5. The Limit of KPIs: What Culture Cannot Tell You in Numbers

The feedback that any honest analysis of this project must engage with is this: not everything that matters in culture can be measured. And when measurement becomes the primary mechanism of accountability, the things that cannot be measured risk being systematically undervalued.

Cultural event days can be counted. The quality of those events cannot be captured in the same KPI. Heritage site visitors can be tallied. Whether those visitors experienced something genuine, something that changed how they understand themselves and their history, does not appear in the data. Cultural employees can be enumerated. Whether the work those employees are doing is creatively free, or constrained by the requirement to stay within the boundaries of the national narrative, is not tracked.

There is a specific risk in measuring culture through outputs. Output metrics favor volume over depth. They reward the thing that happens over the thing that lasts. A cultural system optimized for KPI achievement may produce many events and few masterpieces.

The Ministry's report is aware, at least implicitly, of this tension. Its language distinguishes between quantitative targets and qualitative ambitions. It speaks of "excellence," "quality of experience," and "enabling creativity." These are not KPI categories. They are aspirations that sit alongside the measurement system, not within it.

The honest question for any leader designing a cultural system is this: what are you willing to leave unmeasured? The answer defines the boundaries of the system's accountability. And the things left outside those boundaries are often the things that matter most in the long run.

6. The Legitimacy Question

6.1 The Coherence Advantage

The most significant advantage of state-led cultural identity construction is coherence. When a single institution coordinates sixteen cultural sectors, aligns them to a shared strategic framework, and measures them against common KPIs, it produces a level of narrative consistency that organic cultural development cannot achieve.

Organic cultural development is diverse, contradictory, and unpredictable. It produces richness and surprise. It also produces inconsistency and noise. For a nation trying to communicate a clear and compelling identity story to its own citizens and to the world, coherence is a strategic asset. The sixteen sectors tell different aspects of the same story. Every cultural commission is contributing a chapter. The Ministry is editing the whole.

6.2 The Evidence of Genuine Participation

The legitimacy of state-led cultural construction depends on a crucial condition: whether the culture being constructed reflects and serves the people whose identity it claims to represent.

The Saudi case has features that support legitimacy. The cultural sectors being developed are not imported. They are Saudi in origin. Gahwa, Ardah dance, Najdi architecture, Hijazi textile traditions, the oral poetry of the Arabian Peninsula — these are not invented. They are real. What is happening is not the fabrication of tradition but the formalization and amplification of existing cultural practices.

The domestic participation numbers support this. 14.1 million visitors to heritage sites. 5,536 volunteers contributing 409,323 hours. A generation that wanted cinemas, concerts, fashion, and cultural venues is finding them. The cultural project is producing what people wanted. That alignment between institutional supply and popular demand is itself a form of legitimacy.

6.3 The Tension That Remains

The honest analysis must acknowledge what state-led narrative construction creates. When the state is the storyteller, the story reflects the state's interests and values. Some cultural expressions are funded and amplified. Others receive no institutional support.

The report does not discuss this selection process. It documents achievements. What it cannot document is what is not being included. The question for any observer of the Saudi cultural project is not whether the selections are wrong. It is whether the project leaves enough space for the unpredictable, the contradictory, and the unsanctioned — the dimensions of cultural life that state institutions cannot design and should not try to manage.

7. What Leaders Can Learn from This Model

The Saudi cultural project is not only a case study in cultural policy. It is a lesson in institutional design. Several principles are transferable to any leader, ministry, or organization undertaking a transformation program.

The first lesson is that measurement creates accountability. The Ministry's KPI system is unusual. Most cultural institutions avoid quantification. The Saudi decision to measure everything — and to publish those measurements publicly — changes the accountability dynamic. It makes progress visible. It makes failure visible. It makes the argument for continued investment demonstrable. Any transformation leader who wants to build institutional credibility should ask: what are we measuring, and are we willing to publish it?

The second lesson is that infrastructure precedes output. The cultural sector's dramatic growth was enabled by deliberate infrastructure investment: commissions, training programs, IP frameworks, heritage sites, exhibition venues, film industry licensing. The output numbers are high because the infrastructure was built first. Leaders who want creative economies, innovation ecosystems, or cultural industries should invest in infrastructure before expecting output.

The third lesson is that alignment across sectors multiplies impact. The sixteen cultural sectors do not operate independently. They are aligned to three strategic pillars and to a single national narrative. The fashion commission's work reinforces the heritage commission's work. The film commission's work reinforces the culinary arts commission's work. Aligned systems produce compound effects. Organizations that manage multiple workstreams in isolation miss this multiplier.

The fourth lesson is that human stories are the proof of system success. The KPIs tell you the system is working. The human stories tell you why it matters. Any transformation program that communicates only through aggregate data will struggle to build the emotional legitimacy that sustained public support requires. The numbers open the door. The stories are what people walk through.

The fifth lesson is that the hardest things to measure are often the most important. The Ministry's measurable outputs are impressive. What will ultimately determine the project's legacy is what cannot be measured: the quality of the creative work produced, the depth of the identity formed, the freedom of the voices that emerge. Leaders should design measurement systems with enough humility to acknowledge their own limits.

8. Conclusion: The Story and the Storyteller

The Saudi Ministry of Culture Annual Report 2025 is a document about production. It measures cultural output with the precision of a manufacturing company measuring units. It tracks KPIs. It celebrates overachievement. It reports to leadership.

But culture, unlike manufacturing, cannot be fully contained within its production system. It escapes. It surprises. It takes the forms and funds and institutions that are offered to it and produces things that no ministry expected. The Saudi musicians learning notation through the Music Memory project will not all compose what the project imagined. The Saudi filmmakers who benefit from the IP framework will not all tell the stories the commission anticipated. The visitors who walk through the restored corridors of Historic Jeddah will not all experience what the Heritage Commission planned for them to feel.

This is not a weakness of the project. It is its most important feature. The greatest cultural projects in history have been those that created conditions — institutions, infrastructure, funding, legitimacy — and then allowed human creativity to exceed what the conditions anticipated.

The Saudi cultural project is creating conditions at a scale and speed that has no recent precedent. The conditions are real. The investment is genuine. The infrastructure is being built. What happens inside that infrastructure will be determined not by the Ministry's KPIs but by the 282,709 people who work in the sector, the millions who visit and attend and participate, and the countless Saudi creators who are finding, for the first time, that their country has decided their work matters.

The state has become the storyteller. But the story, in the end, will be told by the people who live inside it. And that is a story no annual report can fully predict.

Key Data Points: Saudi Ministry of Culture Annual Report 2025

All figures are sourced directly from the Ministry of Culture Annual Report 2025.

Additional figures from the report:

• Cultural Investment Conference agreements: over SAR 4 billion
• Saudi pavilion at Expo Osaka: 3 million visitors
• Islamic Arts Biennale 2025, Jeddah: 650,000 visitors
• Riyadh International Book Fair: over 1.3 million visitors
• Historic Jeddah visits: 12 million in 2025
• Newly registered archaeological sites: 2,260
• Saudi food elements registered under the Saudi Taste Journey: 60

© Research Article — Prince Researcher | For Academic and Editorial Use